🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an cute small “sweetheart”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but very loyal companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated debate over their future often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the federal government prevented the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed warned to euthanize them unless the authorities funds the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and social skills point to they are highly cognitive creatures – something Kristy Burgess observed first-hand.

Burgess spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a role that involved building relationships of the marine predators.

“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She cultivated a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with different personalities.

“Eve selected me. The other demanded work,” she said. “They transformed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a background of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.

During her three years at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, died. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility ascribes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say reflects the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The park did not admit visitors to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand results of the shutdown. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and swim around with pieces in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not reply to a questionnaire, but previously asserted: “The whales … receive far higher quality health care and constant supervision than any person in the Britain, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the park in the spring following the demise of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park believed details of the death were shared to the press and she was let go shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “considerable personnel”, equipment and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs calls for the whales to be taken promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a request to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the application would have meant a continued life in confinement and a reversion to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience approve an relocation that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the official’s statements reveal a broader lack of awareness of the circumstances of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As officials struggle to find a resolution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of food for Inuit communities.

A proposed sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has shown to be highly debated. The prospective site, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Advocates remain positive that it could in time represent a sustainable solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the coming months.

The project lead, head of the plan, said the location will replicate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|