🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or withhold as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the current government is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "serious and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental attacks on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's heinous anti-Jewish assault on a British mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the global justice body to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by banning a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been detained, mostly for carrying signs against genocide and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those detained are pensioners; among them a retired priest and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the sitting leader characterized such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually regret how casually we permitted them to be eroded.